If you are saying that the parser functions ({{#property:...}}) aren't being evaluated after the template is transcluded then I guess the feature isn't fully implemented yet.


From: hale.michael.jr@live.com
To: wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 15:11:35 -0400
Subject: Re: [Wikidata-l] Regarding wikidata inclusion syntax

Hey, that's a great project. The current situation with ProteinBoxBot is not ideal. We don't want to create a separate template for every protein. I suppose they do that now to make the articles slightly shorter, but Wikidata will allow us to accomplish the same thing without the confusing extra templates and ultimately to synchronize the infobox data across different language Wikipedias. With Wikidata the idea is that you will eventually just be able to write {{GNF Protein box}} at the top of the protein article and you will get what you want. If you look at our current list of biology properties though, there are still some that need to be added to fully support protein box.
http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:List_of_properties#Biology_.2F_Biologie_.2F_Biologie_.2F_.D0.91.D0.B8.D0.BE.D0.BB.D0.BE.D0.B3.D0.B8.D1.8F

You can start adding data for the current properties already though. I just added the Entrez ID to adenosine deaminase. http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q356093

A list of human proteins on Wikipedia is here. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Human_proteins You can access the list through code by using a MediaWiki API request like this: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=categorymembers&cmtitle=Category:Human_proteins&format=json&cmlimit=500
The use cmcontinue to get them in pages of 500 at a time until you have all 10000.

To go from article title to Wikidata item use something like this:
http://wikidata.org/w/api.php?action=wbgetentities&sites=enwiki&titles=Adenosine%20deaminase&languages=en&format=json

Then you'll want to propose a bot to automatically add properties. http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Requests_for_permissions/Bot

The property inclusion syntax refers to the item on the article that transcludes the template. So all of the extra templates that ProteinBoxBot is currently making would all have identical wiki markup if it was fully using Wikidata.

Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 19:46:25 +0530
From: chin.naik26@gmail.com
To: wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: [Wikidata-l] Regarding wikidata inclusion syntax

Hi,
 
I am Chinmay Naik, an undergrad in CS at Bangalore,India. I hope to contribute to CrowsourcingBiology through GSOC 2013. The project i am interested is "convert bot to write to wikidata". Currently the bot does this     database ---> wikipedia. The proposal is this    database ----> wikidata -----> wikipedia.

I have the basic idea of how to capture gene info onto wikidata. I was wondering about the inclusion syntax of wikidata. I had a look at the current inclusion of wikidata v0.3 meta. Some things are unclear to me. How best it is to map wikidata items on to wiki articles.??

Currently, the bot uses templates. The template structure is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:GNF_Protein_box. The bot fills a various gene templates http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:PBB/100. These gene templates are included on gene wikipedia articles.

I tried to work out on the italian wikipedia. When i try to include a template(mapped to wikidata item) onto an wiki article, the wikidata properties were not displayed.
So is it not possible to include wikidata items in template namespace??
So transclusion where data is retreived from wikidata item not supported??  

Kindly pardon me if this is not the right mailing list to post to about this.

Thanks in advance,
Chinmay



_______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l

_______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l