I would agree with Joe Filceolaire on this.

Compare the results of a search for "John Arbuthnot" on Wikidata:

https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?search=&search=John+Arbuthnot&title=Special%3ASearch&go=Go

against the search for "John Arbuthnot" on Reasonator:
   https://tools.wmflabs.org/reasonator/test/?find=john+arbuthnot

For searching Wikidata, I overwhelmingly prefer to use the Reasonator search, which includes automatically generated descriptions alongside the description field (and things like birth and death dates), because (even in English) it is so much more informative.

   -- James.

On 29/10/2015 06:06, Joe Filceolaire wrote:

My feeling is that, even in English, automatically generated descriptions,
based on properties, are better than description field. For other languages
this is even more true.

This decision is English-centric and that is a shame.

Joe

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 5:48 AM Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen@gmail.com>
wrote:

Hoi,

It is an old argument. It is however very potent. The data that you
provide may be additional and an improvement but it is still very much
second class quality. Automated descriptions are typically superior in any
language. But given the dominance of Wikipedia think it is no wonder that
second class quality has been chosen.

This is no argument to use the kill switch, it is just the realisation
that what is best and brightest elsewhere is not relevant to Wikipedia. It
is apparently the only show in town.
Thanks,
       GerardM

On 29 October 2015 at 03:50, Jon Katz <jkatz@wikimedia.org> wrote:

Hi All,

TLDR: on the mobile web, Wikidata descriptions will appear under article
titles in search results, nearby and watchlist starting tomorrow afternoon
(Thu, Oct 29) across projects.  A 'kill switch' has been implemented so
that this feature can be turned off if necessary.

Background:
In Q2 of last year, Wikidata descriptions were added to both our official
apps: iOS and Android and resulted in wonderful qualitative feedback (as
the discovery team knows, it is hard to define 'success' with search (fewer
searches, more searches?).  Though moving Wikidata descriptions to search
on mobile web was planned for Q3 of last year, it has been sitting in beta
for many months as there was some concern that at scale on the web, it
might prove to be an incentive to vandalize Wikidata (and article editors
would not have an obvious, wikipedia way to undo such edits).

Ultimately, we think that anything showing up on Wikipedia should be
editable ON Wikipedia. Wikidata description editing is something we are
going to aim for. Given the success of descriptions in search results on
apps, we would rather move forward with the presentation and work towards a
goal of editing in-line than to hold up the entire thing based on a fear
that might not be warranted. In consultation with the Wikidata team, we
decided to move forward with pushing the feature to stable as long as we
had the ability to pull the feature back if there were any issues.

We are relying on community feedback to let us know if you have any
issues or hear from anyone that this is causing problems. Our community
liaison team will be posting notices on village pumps shortly. Thanks!

Best,

Jon
WMF Reading Product Lead


_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata

_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata

_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata

_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata