On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Markus Krötzsch
<markus@semantic-mediawiki.org> wrote:
> That's exactly what I am saying. I think your misconception is that what you
> suggest does not happen because of some opposition from the Wikidata
> community. In reality, it simply does not happen because nobody did it yet,
> neither from the DBpedia nor from the Wikidata community. It does not help
> very much to post arguments of how useful this would be. At least you don't
> need to convince me. What is needed is deed, not talk.
Wikipedians have objections because importing from Wikipedia is
already bad enough in their eyes. Importing from an extraction is even
worse in their eyes. We should have convincing numbers about the
quality of extraction. This is a reputation problem for Wikidata. One
we're spending a lot of time improving and will need to spend a lot
more on.
> The folks working on the primary sources tool are trying to provide a
> standard process for almost arbitrary data imports. It was just my first
> thought for turning your complaint into something that could work as a
> solution -- if you have a better idea which tool to use, feel free to post
> it.
Big +1.
Cheers
Lydia
--
Lydia Pintscher - http://about.me/lydia.pintscher
Product Manager for Wikidata
Wikimedia Deutschland e.V.
Tempelhofer Ufer 23-24
10963 Berlin
www.wikimedia.de
Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e. V.
Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg
unter der Nummer 23855 Nz. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das
Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985.
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata