Yes I got the gist of that hint and am still thinking about it. I am still not sure, but probably yes. It's the same reasoning as for the WLM unique identifiers btw. I am leaning towards at least one set of identifiers per country. We can think of these heritage sites after all as objects in the collection of "living history museums" 

On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Sandra Fauconnier <sandra.fauconnier@gmail.com> wrote:
As I hinted on project chat: if we create a property for MoMA IDs, we really have to be consistent and create property for all art collections that use persistent IDs and of which we have items on Wikidata.
I think we (will) have hundreds of these.
Are we OK with that - having hundreds of museum and art collection-specific properties?

Best, Sandra

On 30 Jul 2015, at 17:44, Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen@gmail.com> wrote:

Hoi,
Good job ... went there to approve ... but as there is nothing to approve I do.
Thanks,
      GerardM

On 30 July 2015 at 16:27, Andy Mabbett <andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote:
On 30 July 2015 at 14:52, Magnus Manske <magnusmanske@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Everyone vote for MoMA property creation please ;-)
>
> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Property_proposal/Authority_control#MoMA_artwork

I took the liberty of speedily creating that - P2014

--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk

_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata

_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata


_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata