On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Andrew Gray <andrew.gray@dunelm.org.uk> wrote:
One other issue to bear in mind: it's *simple* to have properties as a
separate thing. I have been following this discussion with some
interest but... well, I don't think I'm particularly stupid, but most
of it is completely above my head.

Saying "here are items, here are a set of properties you can define
relating to them, here's some notes on how to use properties" is going
to get a lot more people able to contribute than if they need to start
understanding theoretical aspects of semantic relationships...

Definitely, I cannot agree more. TBH, the original question of this thread was already settled some messages ago.
I understand that it might result confusing that we have wandered off into other realms, so I consider that it is better to consider this thread closed and I will consider opening a new one with the right topic (which is quite different as it started :-P)

Cheers,
Micru