Why were we even talking about stewards overruling local admins? I don't see that suggested in any of the emails above, and obviously it would be totally inappropriate.

But on the whole I agree, Vito. There are more productive ways of dealing with this.

Adrian Raddatz

On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 8:18 AM, Andy Mabbett <andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote:
On 6 August 2016 at 07:42, Yaroslav M. Blanter <putevod@mccme.ru> wrote:

> Andy Mabbett писал 2016-08-04 22:45:
>> On 1 August 2016 at 01:05, Vi to <vituzzu.wiki@gmail.com> wrote:

>> There is no community action to overrule. The deletion was done by
>> single, involved admin, with no discussion, and without any backing in
>> policy.
> Really?

Really, You're welcome to provide evidence to the contrary (note:
that's "evidence", not "assertion".)

> And we, the admin cabal, just massively disregard policies?

Who said anything about a cabal?

> May be you should learn to listen at some point. You have been provided with
> all necessary explanations, multiple times.


> You may agree or disagree, but
> repeatedly stating there were no explanations is IDONOTHEARIT.

Where have I stated that there were "no explanations"? Sadly, the very
few that have been offered have been easily refuted, both here and on
Wikidata's admin noticeboard, as they include logical fallacies, make
claims made with no evidence, do not address the concerns raised and
are not based in any policy.

> Stop it.

On the basis of your authority?

Andy Mabbett

Wikidata mailing list