Hello,

Sorry, but what has "the new head of the WMF" to do with the community matters of Wikidata?

Greetings,

Sjoerd de Bruin
sjoerddebruin@me.com

Op 31 jul. 2016, om 19:18 heeft Info WorldUniversity <info@worlduniversityandschool.org> het volgende geschreven:

Thanks Andy for helping focus these developing process questions. What role could the new head of the WMF play here in positive regards?

Regards, Scott

On Jul 31, 2016 10:09 AM, "Andy Mabbett" <andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote:

On 31 July 2016 at 16:43, Adrian Raddatz <ajraddatz@gmail.com> wrote:

> my personal opinion is that these items are
> fine as well. But (and here's the important thing), it's not a big deal
> either way. The site will continue, and this especially should not be a time
> for trying to force an opinion one way or the other onto the community. :-)

The big deal is about how we decide how Wikidata policies are applied
- do we seek to obtain community consensus, or do we allow involved
admins to decide by fait accompli?

--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk

_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata

_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata

_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata