Hi Micru and Wikidatans,
Anthropology actively develops participant observation as methodology in
academic spheres in multiple languages, and it also centralizes writing
about peoples and field sites and related anthropological questions in a
globalizing world these days. I wonder how one best could add fairly open
participant observation field note "data fields" as notation to Q items in
Wikidata ... as one sensible approach to the questions you're asking,
anticipating versions after Wikidata 2 as well. Apply the wiki Wikipedia
approach to Wikidata Q items? While one could further focus such a wiki /
writing / Q item approach in terms of amplitude, and a host of other
physics' concepts, coding Wikidata database Q items for writing-openness in
specific ways in terms of developing data manipulation has merit.
Scott
Hi,
I am investigating some concepts about signal processing and relating them
to data manipulation. It is somehow difficult because the way computer
scientists relate to concepts is very dogmatic, something is either black
or white, however I have not found much on "things that under certain
circumstances can be considered black-ish, and under another set of
circumstances can be considered white-ish"
http://freethoughtblogs.com/singham/2012/06/25/shades-of-grey-optical-illus…
In signal processing there is the concept of amplitude which is just the
signal strength. For humans language is like an amplitude communication
process where the receiver picks up not only the signal, but also its
amplitude depending on context, awareness, previous knowledge, etc. factors
which in turn can be considered waves being processed by the ontological
biological-organizational complex, the body-mind.
It is tough to describe that a certain concept might have a certain
amplitude in some situations and other amplitude in other situations, and
perhaps even harder to make a human interface for it.
Has anyone attempted it in the past? If Q items are not static entities,
what is the best way to convey that they are not? And is it possible or
desirable at all?
Perhaps these questions are more suitable for a Wikidata 2.0, or perhaps it
is already doable, who knows.
Any thoughts?
Cheers,
Micru
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata