Hoi,
I would seriously consider this for two reasons. Yes, we can include this kind of information, obviously. It is worthwhile information so that is one.

The most important reason why I want to seriously have this information is because the audience we gain. It is the developers of MediaWiki. They gain first hand experience and consequently they will start first to gain experience and use it and second start to consider it for what else  Wikidata can do for them.

My blogpost about Commons and Wikidata was written exactly because Wikidata is not understood and considered by this most vital group for the further development of Wikidata and MediaWiki.
Thanks,
     GerardM

http://ultimategerardm.blogspot.nl/2014/03/commons-and-wikidata-architecture-of.html


On 20 March 2014 06:09, Quim Gil <qgil@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Organize MediaWiki's catalog of 1000s of extensions using Wikidata. Is this a sensible idea? Reality checks and other opinions are welcome here or at 

https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46704#c33

Pasting the relevant part for convenience:

Has anybody discussed the possibility of creating Wikidata items for extensions, after defining a set of properties to describe them? Linking those Wikidata items to mediawiki.org extension pages, and then playing with templates and what not to keep the semantic data up to date (version number, last release, dependencies, compatible with MediaWiki releases...)? Then play with templates, queries and visualizations to create all kinds of useful output, from structured extension pages to a proper and robust map of extensions.


--
Quim Gil
Engineering Community Manager @ Wikimedia Foundation
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Qgil

_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l