Hoi,
And given that DBpedia finds its changes from the RSS feed for an
increasing number of Wikipedias and given that we at Wikidata do not even
regularly harvest data based on "category contains" on a regular basis
(just as an example) there is no justifiable room for any sense of
superiority at Wikidata.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 5 May 2018 at 20:35, David Abián <davidabian(a)wikimedia.es> wrote:
Wikipedia isn't a read-only interface but an
editable project, so there
will always be contents in Wikipedia that aren't in Wikidata, so DBpedia
will always have the opportunity to offer contents from Wikipedia that
aren't in Wikidata. That's all.
El 05/05/18 a las 19:52, Andy Mabbett escribió:
I
don't mean a technical lack of expressiveness, but the impossibility,
and lack of intention, for Wikipedia to become a read-only interface of
Wikidata someday.
Well, neither is DBpedia, so I don't see how that
substantiates your
claim.
--
David Abián
Wikimedia España
https://wikimedia.es/
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata