Let us see, once Wikidata has replaced most of the local language links,
what is left and how the world looks then. This would be then the
appropriate moment to consider how to further extend the system. Right now
we would be building on too many assumptions that we cannot validate for a
rather small benefit.
Cheers,
Denny
2012/11/28 Lukas Benedix <benedix(a)zedat.fu-berlin.de>
Is there any reason not to have links from
wikidata/FooBar to
en.wiki/FooBar and de.wiki/Foo#Bar? It would be a directed edge, but is
that a problem?
I think there are a lot of articles especially in the german wikipedia
where you don't have FooBar but Foo#Bar.
LB
On 27.11.2012 19:30, Marco Fleckinger wrote:
While having 3 articles in German it is always
the same article in
English.
AFAIK something like that is not possible to reflect in WikiData.
Correct.
In such a case, old style language links have to be used in the wikitext.
Note
however that the English article can only have one outgoing interlanguage
link
to german, the others are ignored (this was changed in core a few weeks
ago,
unrelated to wikidata).
One solution would be to create a "hub" page for the law in general on
the
German wikipedia too.
-- daniel
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
--
Project director Wikidata
Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. | Obentrautstr. 72 | 10963 Berlin
Tel. +49-30-219 158 26-0 |
http://wikimedia.de
Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V.
Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter
der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für
Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985.