Yes, absolutely. Apologies for being unclear: we consider each axiom as a hypothesis that should be reviewed. This is indeed a jargon since logical statements in OWL are usually called axioms (and in our case those statements can be actually wrong since they are acquired from data automatically).SlavaOn 25 October 2016 at 16:27, Federico Leva (Nemo) <nemowiki@gmail.com> wrote:As far as I know, an axiom by definition can't be false. What definition are you using? Maybe some jargon specific to this research field?
Nemo
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata