I'd like to share a basic proposal of how this tool could work:

https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/Wikidata_Paintbrush

Please help flesh it out with your ideas for features!

And it would be fantastic to develop connections with Zooniverse and NYPL and partners as well.

It would also be great if folks could join or "endorse" - this isn't a grant request, but I thought the IdeaLab format might be a good way to channel energies.

Thanks,
Richard
(User:Pharos)

On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 1:58 PM, David Lowe <davidlowe@nypl.org> wrote:
I'd be interested, too, and try to enlist my colleagues at NYPL in this discussion. 

David Lowe | The New York Public Library
Specialist II, Photography Collection

Photographers' Identities Catalog


On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 1:32 PM, Alex Stinson <astinson@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Merilee: Great!

I will include Richard on that conversation, because I think having a useful and tangible case study ("We have this Met collection, we want to host it on Wikimedia Commons, and receive a feed of recommended data changes to Commons/Wikidata via a Zooniverse project") that could be a good way to demonstrate how this could be useful

Cheers, 

Alex

On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 1:12 PM, Proffitt,Merrilee <proffitm@oclc.org> wrote:

I have Zooniverse connections. I’ll introduce you, Alex.

 

Merrilee Proffitt, Senior Program Officer
OCLC Research

 

From: Wikidata [mailto:wikidata-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Alex Stinson
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2017 8:39 AM
To: Discussion list for the Wikidata project. <wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org>
Subject: Re: [Wikidata] Tools for artworks and Depicts property

 

They are on my list of folks I want to consult with as part of Structured Commons -- definitely want to understand better how we could use their environment to describe more of our content (and what they need from that content). Does anyone have connections? 

 

They are at Oxford, Adler Museum, U. of Portsmouth in the UK, and University of Minnesota.

 

Cheers, 

 

Alex

 

On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Andy Mabbett <andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote:

On 7 June 2017 at 14:47, Alex Stinson <astinson@wikimedia.org> wrote:

> most of the crowd-sourcing strategies on Zooniverse, require a certain
> number of folks to affirm a decision, before they are added to a likely
> positive queue (https://www.zooniverse.org/).

Why don't we partner with Zooniverse (or a similar body)?

--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk


_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata



 

--

Alex Stinson 

GLAM-Wiki Strategist

Wikimedia Foundation

Twitter:@glamwiki/@sadads

 

Learn more about how the communities behind Wikipedia, Wikidata and other Wikimedia projects partner with cultural heritage organizations: http://glamwiki.org


_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata




--
Alex Stinson 
GLAM-Wiki Strategist
Wikimedia Foundation
Twitter:@glamwiki/@sadads

Learn more about how the communities behind Wikipedia, Wikidata and other Wikimedia projects partner with cultural heritage organizations: http://glamwiki.org

_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata



_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata