Sorry Lydia, but I can't read that in your reply. I point on an overlooked issue with designing the current version. I see no recognition that this is an issue that is taken serious and needs to be solved. You mention that there are issues that will be solved, but the issue raised here is not taken into account (it seems).
You say that you will move forward. I reply on that the current design is a downfall compared with how it was. I conclude based on what I notice in the editing workflow that the change is not an improvement.
In your reply you do not give the impression that the issue raised here is going to be solved, nor that you want to restore the previous workable version, so in that perspective you keep the current design which is troubling. It is a step back. If someone would ask me to put the versions in chronological order of development based on how it works for users, than the current version would come before the previous version. If the current design would have been followed by the previous design, I would have
congratulated the Wikidata team with this major improvement, which makes editing Wikidata for users much easier.
Are there any plans yet in what the workflow of users is restored to a workable situation?
Romaine