Manual descriptions are, in the vast majority of cases, a waste of volunteer time. Alternative: http://magnusmanske.de/wordpress/?p=265
On Sun Feb 08 2015 at 17:37:42 Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, How does that help ? The point is exactly that there is no point to descriptions. Why iterate on a dog it will still be a mutt. Thanks, GerardM
On 8 February 2015 at 14:07, Amir E. Aharoni <amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.il
wrote:
I'd rather see it not as something terribly disappointing, but as an opportunity to find a way to fill item descriptions more efficiently.
Basically, to find some cycles to resolve https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T64695 בתאריך 8 בפבר 2015 10:33, "Gerard Meijssen" gerard.meijssen@gmail.com כתב:
Hoi, I understand that item descriptions are going to be used in a mobile app. In my opinion that is seriously disappointing because it is not realistic to expect enough coverage in any language. Particularly in the small languages it will not be really useful.
My question is: we have had automated descriptions for a long time. What is it that they makes that they are not used.?
Thanks, GerardM
Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l