Hi,
this is what the monolingual text datatype is for. The labels however are multilingual and should provide users in all languages an idea how the name is said.
Best regards
Bene
Am 01.05.2015 um 07:14 schrieb Gerard Meijssen:
Hoi,It is still a bad idea. An official name exists only in one language.Thanks,GerardM
On 30 April 2015 at 18:50, Thomas Douillard <thomas.douillard@gmail.com> wrote:
I meant "add automatically the transliteration", not replace the name.This is a good candidate : we know for sure the source and the target language (the one of the user) so a good choice for transliteration method is always possible, and we don't pretend it should be the way to say orally the name in the target language. It's just a transliteration of the official name.
2015-04-30 15:14 GMT+02:00 Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen@gmail.com>:
GerardMThanks,Hoi,It does not quality anything. It is plain wrong.
On 30 April 2015 at 15:06, Joe Filceolaire <filceolaire@gmail.com> wrote:
Exactly. The "official name " property always has the name in the original script. But we can and should have the transliteration in a qualifier.
Joe
On 30 Apr 2015 06:13, "Gerard Meijssen" <gerard.meijssen@gmail.com> wrote:
GerardMThanks,Hoi,We transliterate every name from one script to the other. Transliteration the official name is exactly the one you should not transliterate.. What is left after transliteration is not official.
On 29 April 2015 at 18:54, Thomas Douillard <thomas.douillard@gmail.com> wrote:
It's always possible to transliterate the official name property. Of course this should be done by a gadget, or we may have to find a special treatment for the ''name'' properties.
2015-04-28 23:06 GMT+02:00 Joe Filceolaire <filceolaire@gmail.com>:
I agree up to a point. Transliteration is not appropriate for labels for all items. There are however a few categories of items for which transliterated labels are appropriate. For example :
* English labels for villages and towns
* English labels for people
*English labels for bands and albums
I'm sure there are others that could use this too.Joe
On 27 Apr 2015 18:09, "Leon Liesener" <leon.liesener@wikipedia.de> wrote:
The problem with ISO is that it's a standard for language-independent
transliteration to Latin script. Since labels on Wikidata are
language-dependent, making use of ISO does not make sense really. If
you use ISO for Russian names in Cyrillic script, the label you get is
not in English. It's still in Russian but transliterated to Latin
script. ISO thus would only fit as an alias for the Russian interface
language, if at all.
2015-04-26 22:39 GMT+02:00 Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen@gmail.com>:
> Hoi,
> <grin> ISO is a reliable source; it is THE standard </grin> Wikipedia is
> definitely not a standard by its own admission.
> Thanks,
> GerardM
>
> On 26 April 2015 at 22:37, Yaroslav M. Blanter <putevod@mccme.ru> wrote:
>>
>> On 2015-04-26 22:33, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
>>>
>>> Hoi
>>> My point is that it is not a given that we should follow any WIkipedia
>>> for anything. Also the point of romanisation of Russian is not for the
>>> benefit of Russian speakers, it is for the speakers of English.
>>> Thanks,
>>> GerardM
>>>
>>
>> On one hand, yes.
>>
>> On the other hand, no reliable source uses ISO. When NYT writes about a
>> Russian person, they do not use ISO, they use what the English Wikipedia
>> uses or smth similar. In my passport, they do not use ISO (fortunately), why
>> should then ISO be used on Wikidata in an entry about me?
>>
>>
>> Cheers
>> Yaroslav
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikidata-l mailing list
>> Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikidata-l mailing list
> Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
>
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l