Hello all,
We’ve been working on a new data type that allows you to link to the *tabular
data files <https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Tabular_Data>* that are now
stored on Commons. This data type will be deployed on Wikidata on *May 15th*
.
The property creators will be able to create properties with this tabular
data type by selecting “tabular data” in the data type list.
When the property is created, you can use it in statements, and when
filling the value, if you start typing a string, you can choose the name of
a file in the list of what exists on Commons.
Before the deployment, you can test it on http://test.wikidata.org (example
<https://test.wikidata.org/wiki/Q59992>).
One thing to note: We currently do not export statements that use this
datatype to RDF. They can therefore not be queried in the Wikidata Query
Service. The reason is that we are still waiting for tabular data files to
get stable URIs. This is handled in this ticket
<https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T161527>.
If you have any question, feel free to ask!
--
Léa Lacroix
Project Manager Community Communication for Wikidata
Wikimedia Deutschland e.V.
Tempelhofer Ufer 23-24
10963 Berlin
www.wikimedia.de
Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e. V.
Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter
der Nummer 23855 Nz. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für
Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/029/42207.
Hi,
There is a property proposal to store a SPARQL query equivalent to a
category:
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Property_proposal/Wikidata_SPARQL_qu…
I have some doubts about the appropriate datatype. I guess it depends on
future plans/community preferences.
My ideal scenario would be a datatype "SPARQL query" that would store the
plain text and it would be collapsed in the user interface. Users would be
able to expand the code or just run it directly. Additionally, queries
could be qualified with qualifiers TBD, that would allow to query existing
queries, or define how frequently the cached query should be updated.
If that would be too much work, then the datatype "string" or a short/long
URL to the query seem also valid options.
What are your thoughts on the issue?
Cheers,
Micru