I agree with Daniel Werners last post, though it looks like it has 2 typos in it. Will highlight them to avoid confusion:
> Just having the data value, taking its
data type and using a standard formatter for that data value type would be sufficient
"data type" should just be "type".
> With your approach, we would take this
flexibility. That's what I've been afraid of in the first place.
"flexibility" probably should be something else.
Cheers
--
Jeroen De Dauw
http://www.bn2vs.comDon't panic. Don't be evil. ~=[,,_,,]:3
--