> I would prefer "DataValueImplementations" over "CommonDataValues".

Why?

One argument for this is that it will be more consistent with the Composer package name, which will be in the form of data-values/something.

An argument against is that CommonDataValues better describes the package (it does not contain all implementations, just the "common" ones), and is probably easier to understand when you've not come across it before.

Cheers

--
Jeroen De Dauw
http://www.bn2vs.com
Don't panic. Don't be evil. ~=[,,_,,]:3
--