Hi,
I would actually still stick with these layouts. I know the API allows for
a more powerful usage of badges, but the UI could simply allow to set FA or
GA, and leave the rest of the badges alone, as a first step.
In a second step we could think about how to deal with the full power of
the badges API, but this would require some layout drafts first.
I hope this makes sense,
Cheers,
Denny
2013/9/1 Michał Łazowik <mlazowik(a)me.com>
Wiadomość napisana przez Yair Rand
<yyairrand(a)gmail.com> w dniu 1 wrz
2013, o godz. 14:51:
Badges are for the purpose of marking articles as
featured articles and
good articles and such, correct? If so, I figure they would
generally only
need to take up about one small icon's worth of width in the sitelink row,
maybe not even needing a special column. There already is an effective
"edit this sitelink" mode that the interface goes to when an edit button is
clicked, so badges could be edited from that.
That's the purpose, and that's how they appear in the first mockups [0].
That won't work now,
because the team made a decision that badges can point to any items (note
that there can be more
than one badges per sitelink), so the editing has now to be similar to
editing aliases, as it's more
than a simple on/off switch.
Michał
[0]
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/aa/20120621_wikidata_layou…
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-tech mailing list
Wikidata-tech(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-tech
--
Project director Wikidata
Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. | Obentrautstr. 72 | 10963 Berlin
Tel. +49-30-219 158 26-0 |
http://wikimedia.de
Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V.
Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter
der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für
Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985.