2013/6/17 Jeroen De Dauw <jeroendedauw@gmail.com>

Hey,

I agree with Daniel Werners last post, though it looks like it has 2 typos in it. Will highlight them to avoid confusion:

> Just having the data value, taking its data type and using a standard formatter for that data value type would be sufficient

"data type" should just be "type".

You are right, taking the values data value type and putting a standard formatter for that (no data type involved).

> With your approach, we would take this flexibility. That's what I've been afraid of in the first place.

"flexibility" probably should be something else.

Not really. Talking about the flexibility of additional attributes on properties that do change validation and/or formatting of values of PVS using that property.

Cheers

--
Jeroen De Dauw
http://www.bn2vs.com
Don't panic. Don't be evil. ~=[,,_,,]:3
--

_______________________________________________
Wikidata-tech mailing list
Wikidata-tech@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-tech