Hi!
Makes sense. I'll look into how to get those. Is language code OK or we
> When showing labels from fallback languages we do have little language
> indicators in other places. I believe we should have this here as
need full language name (uk vs. Ukrainian)?
One thing to note here is that secondary languages have no order - i.e.
if you look in German, and there's no matching German label, but there
are 10 other language labels all the same (happens a lot for names &
places), which language will be selected is anybody's guess. We could
add rule that says "look at English as secondary first", in theory, but
not sure whether we should - after all, besides having most languages,
(and us speaking it :) there's not much special about it.
OK.
> I'm slightly leaning toward showing both.
OK, I'll try to make this.
> I'd say in this case we could get rid of the word/byte count. To get a
> good glimpse of the quality of the item I'd say we'd want to show
> count of statements (excluding identifier statements), identifiers and
> sitelinks.
OK then, I'll feel free to shuffle things around then :) Having more
>> 5. Display format for Wikidata and for other wikipedia sites is different:
>> Wikpedia:
>>
>> Title
>> Snippet
>>
>> Wikidata:
>>
>> Title: Description
>>
>> I.e. Wikipedia puts title on a separate line, while Wikidata keeps it on
>> the same line, separated by colon. Is there any reason for this
>> difference? Do we want to go back to the common format?
>
> Not sure if we had a reason tbh.
freedom in the title line is good because we can then display both label
& aliases.
Thanks!
--
Stas Malyshev
smalyshev@wikimedia.org