Version | Colored? | Wikidata against 3 WPs | With imprecise dates? |
---|---|---|---|
Report 2 | No | No | Yes |
Report 2.1 | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Report 2.2 | Yes | Yes | No |
Report 2.3 | Yes | No | No |
BestYes, I have two options, I can just skip them or I can mark them in another color like pink or something else.What do you think? and what color if you recommend the latter.
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Magnus Manske <magnusmanske@googlemail.com> wrote:
_______________________________________________Cheers,Wikidata is less precise than Wikipedia here, but not actually wrong. Maybe these cases should be treated separately from the potential errors.Thanks for this.You might want to filter it, though: For example https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q85256 states "born in 1606" (no month or day given), but your report at https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Ladsgroup/Birth_date_report2/26 gives it as 1606-01-01, which then conflicts with the date given in Wikipedias (1606-03-18).
Magnus
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Amir Ladsgroup <ladsgroup@gmail.com> wrote:Best--On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Amir Ladsgroup <ladsgroup@gmail.com> wrote:It's possible and rather easy to add them .just several regexes and list of months in that language are needed. but the issue is no major wikis except these three are using a person data template (Almost all of them have the template but almost none of them are using it widely) If any other wiki is using a person data template widely, I would be happy to implement it.Best
--On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Amir E. Aharoni <amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.il> wrote:
Can we join more Wikipedias to the comparison?
--
Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי
http://aharoni.wordpress.com
“We're living in pieces,
I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore2014-08-19 10:38 GMT+03:00 Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen@gmail.com>:_______________________________________________Hoi,
Amir has created functionality that compares data from en.wp de.wp and
it.wp. It is data about "humans" and it only shows differences where they
exist. It compares those four Wikipedias with information in Wikidata.
The idea is that the report will be updated regularly.
The problem we face is: what should it actually look like. Should it just
splatter the info on a page or is more needed. At this time we just have
data [1].
Please help us with something that works easily for now. Once we have
something, it can be prettified and more functional.
Thanks,
GerardM
[1] http://paste.ubuntu.com/8079742/
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Amir
Amir
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
Wikidata-tech mailing list
Wikidata-tech@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-tech
--
Amir