Thank you Luca! Unfortunately I do not have programming skills. I am looking for research results or data already available on these questions to make a reference in my research writing. Thanks again. Have a nice day, Mayo «·´`·.(*·.¸(`·.¸ ¸.·´)¸.·*).·´`·» «·´¨*·¸¸« Mayo Fuster Morell ».¸.·*¨`·» «·´`·.(¸.·´(¸.·* *·.¸)`·.¸).·´`·» Research Digital Commons Governance: http://www.onlinecreation.info European University Institute - Phd Candidate School of information Berkeley Visiting researcher Phone Italy: 0039-3345440747 or 0039-0558409982 Phone Spanish State: 0034-648877748 E-mail: mayo.fuster(a)eui.eu Skype: mayoneti Identi.ca: Mayo Postal address: Badia Fiesolana - Via dei Roccettini 9, I-50014 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) - Italy Fax [+39] 055 4685 201 -----Missatge original----- De: wiki-research-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org en nom de Luca de Alfaro Enviat el: dg. 11/04/2010 23:14 Per a: Research into Wikimedia content and communities Tema: Re: [Wiki-research-l] Help to solve three doubts on Wikipediaresearch data Hi Mayo, On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Fuster, Mayo <Mayo.Fuster(a)eui.eu> wrote: revisions database table, but then I noticed that no dump of this table in isolation is available from download.wikimedia.org... You can however access all this data by using the Wikipedia API ( http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/API) but it requires some programming.

On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 11:45 PM, James Howison <james(a)howison.name> wrote: The mediawiki API described at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/api.php includes * action=clicktracking * Track user clicks on JavaScript items. * action=specialclicktracking * Returns data to the Special:ClickTracking visualization page I tried to call them but you need to have admin rights, I think. If you want to try it, you should do it on a mediawiki of which you are admin. If you try, I will be interesting to know what these methods return. P.

On 4/11/10 2:14 PM, Luca de Alfaro wrote: Actually, if you go to: http://download.wikipedia.org/{{wiki}}/latest/{{wiki}}-latest-stub-meta-his… and replace {{wiki}} with the wiki you're interested in (for instance, enwiki for english wikipedia) you'll basically get the revision table without the actual data of the text, it's a little bit smaller and more manageable that way. You'd have to do some analysis on it, but this could at least get you this information.

Thank you Gregory. I didn't want to imply that the data should be public. But if Wikipedia system "learn" from the searchers and the navigation of the visitors. The reason why I am interested on this question is because I am discussing if and why even only using (without contributing) can be beneficiary for Wikipedia. In the line of side-effects, "contributing without intending to contribute". Thank you again. Have a nice day! Mayo «·´`·.(*·.¸(`·.¸ ¸.·´)¸.·*).·´`·» «·´¨*·¸¸« Mayo Fuster Morell ».¸.·*¨`·» «·´`·.(¸.·´(¸.·* *·.¸)`·.¸).·´`·» Research Digital Commons Governance: http://www.onlinecreation.info European University Institute - Phd Candidate School of information Berkeley Visiting researcher Phone Italy: 0039-3345440747 or 0039-0558409982 Phone Spanish State: 0034-648877748 E-mail: mayo.fuster(a)eui.eu Skype: mayoneti Identi.ca: Mayo Postal address: Badia Fiesolana - Via dei Roccettini 9, I-50014 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) - Italy Fax [+39] 055 4685 201 -----Missatge original----- De: wiki-research-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org en nom de Gregory Maxwell Enviat el: dg. 11/04/2010 23:47 Per a: Research into Wikimedia content and communities Tema: Re: [Wiki-research-l] Help to solve three doubts on Wikipediaresearch data On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Fuster, Mayo <Mayo.Fuster(a)eui.eu> wrote: No. Although that is an interesting area of research. Unfortunately, due to privacy concerns the data that would be required to invent such a system (search strings and search click through traces) is not available to the public. (and in fact, the traces aren't really collected, currently, as far as I know) _______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

I guess that Wiki(pedia|media) could very well gather statistics on (revision_id, clicked_link) pairs without compromising the anonimity of the visitors. It would be very useful to have indications on which hyperlinks are most useful. For example, I am always curious whether the large editorial effort to curate categories is worth it. And also, if one had data on: (revision_id, "search terms used in next search"), one could infer which links are actually missing. The problem is that many people use search engines rather than Wikipedia's own search to navigate the Wikipedia... but perhaps the information could still be reconstructed somehow from session information. But as far as I know, there is no plan nor current infrastructure to have such anonymously logged data. I don't work there, however, so other better-informed people might comment. Luca On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Ziko van Dijk <zvandijk(a)googlemail.com>wrote;wrote:

The first thing I proposed is innocuous (gathering stats on (revision_id, clicked_link)), and in fact can be done easily with a minimum of instrumentation. The second is very different from the AOL search data. The AOL search data was problematic because it associated data on a per-user basis, so you could use some queries to figure out who the user was, and then see the other queries of the user. I am suggesting here to instead gather anonymous statistics on: (<was on page A>, did a search, <landed on page B>), keeping track only of the (A, B) pairs, without user information. But the problem is that gathering such anonymous logs takes effort, is difficult to do securely, is difficult to avoid someone tamper with it and add back information that should not have been there, and it is difficult to then present the information to Wikipedia editors in a way that helps them meaningfully improve pages. So perhaps the first statistic is the only useful one. I would also be curious to know, once a user enters, what % of next visits are due to the visitor clicking on links, vs. doing a search. Luca On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Anthony &lt;wikimail(a)inbox.org&gt; wrote:

The fact that there are only a few wikimedia personell who are able to access the information about browsing trails, and a few community representatives who can check the IP's for registered users doesn't mean Wikimedia doesn't spy. It spys heavily on editing, and then offers some of the information back to the community. That research was just focused on Flash cookies, not general ability to get information about users activities. If it doesn't store any IP address => HTTP GET URL information it would be making itself very open to DOS attacks that it wouldn't have any information to use to defend itself. Maybe people should be educated in the ways they can defend against the systematic privacy issues like flash cookies and single pixel tracking cookies etc.,. I defend against long term profiling using the NoScript [1], BetterPrivacy [2] and Adblock Plus [3] addons for Firefox. Any flash or DOM storage that I actually allow, will still get wiped everytime the browser reboots, along with all of the cookies (only session cookies allowed in my browser settings). What a website learns within a single session of my browsing is their business as long as their Privacy Policy is accurate. If I didn't want it to be their business I would use a VPN or another anonimising program to further restrict the amount of information they can usefully put together about me. The amount of information they get shouldn't be reliant on me. Even the User-Agent can be spoofed to a generic string to deidentify the masses who are using the same method of anonymisation on the same website (ie, TorButton [4]). If you are personally worried, there are many many ways to protect yourself on the web. However, the majority of people won't ever realise their existence or see their importance unless a website started saying exactly what they knew about a person (especially a cross-domain entity like googlesyndication.com which incidentally papers.ssrn.com attempts to make me use if I didn't have adblock plus and noscript enabled to protect against) Cheers, Peter [1] https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/722 [2] https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/6623 [3] https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1865 [4] https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/2275 On 12 April 2010 08:19, Ziko van Dijk &lt;zvandijk(a)googlemail.com&gt; wrote: