Hey guys.
I wrote a proposal for reviewing all research done on human subjects on
Wikipedia. Please check it out here.
<
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research_talk:Committee/Areas_of_interest/Su…
Dario suggested that conversation about subject recruitment leave this
mailing list. Could I ask that someone set up a human subject research
mailing list and then describe how I may join it?
Thanks.
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Aaron Halfaker <aaron.halfaker(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
> James,
> Please discontinue hijacking this
discussion about Audrey's proposal for
> your crusade. If you'd like to challenge Dario publicly, please start your
> own thread.
> -Aaron
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:54 PM, James Salsman <jsalsman(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>> Yaroslav M. Blanter
<putevod(a)mccme.ru> wrote:
>
>> > actually, I am pretty sure we did
discuss the procedure which requires
>> > endorsement (we did not call it approval), either at the extraordinary
>> > meeting in December (related to the survey banner story) or in the RCom
>> > mailing list in the thread related to the same story....
>
>> The discussion in the RCom mailing list
archives is fairly summarized by
>>
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/rcom-l/2011-December/000506.html
>> "I rather suspect that there isn't consensus on this committee to
restrict
>> researchers in their requesting community members to complete research
>> questionnaires."
>
>> The subsequent etherpad minutes for the
December 22, 2011 meeting,
>> discuss a "future subject recruitment policy" which the participants
>> state they do not understand how to craft.
>
>> > do not call other people liars
unless you have very strong proofs....
>
>> Is there any way to interpret these two
statements such that one of
>> them is not a lie?
>
>> "this is a policy that we're
enforcing ... approval is required"
>
>>
http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Research_talk%3AFAQ&diff=34…
>
>> "due to the lack of a formal
policy, the RCom has never been in a
>> position to grant any kind of "definitive approval" to recruit
>> participants"
>
>>
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wiki-research-l/2012-March/001896.html
>
>> The first of those two statements was
made in an effort to accuse me
>> of misconduct. I stand by my statements, and I am certain that I have
>> acted ethically.
>
>> It would be best if this issue were
addressed as a mistake on the part
>> of those who have contradicted themselves.
>
>> Sincerely,
>> James Salsman
>
>>
_______________________________________________
>> Wiki-research-l mailing list
>> Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>
>
_______________________________________________
> Wiki-research-l mailing list
> Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
--
Lane Rasberry
206.801.0814
lane(a)bluerasberry.com