Thanks for the heads-up, Rhododendrites.
I hope other researchers and research fans on this list will provide their
perspectives as well!
Jonathan
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:27 AM, Leila Zia <leila(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
Hi Rhododendrites,
Thanks for sharing this here. I went through it and left a comment.
Imo, this is an important thread for this list's audience to engage
with, to share your perspective, and to help the enwiki community come
up with a compiled set of (new?) guidelines for how research can be
done on enwiki which takes your needs into account, but also respects
their invaluable personal time they spend to make English Wikipedia
better everyday.
Best,
Leila
--
Leila Zia
Senior Research Scientist
Wikimedia Foundation
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Rhododendrites
<rhododendrites(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi research-l,
I came across this discussion on enwiki relevant to this list. The
proposal
is to add a section to the "What Wikipedia
is NOT" page which would put
in
place guidelines and requirements for people
researching Wikipedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:What_Wikipedia_
is_not#RFC:Wikipedia_Is_Not_a_Laboratory
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
--
Jonathan T. Morgan
Senior Design Researcher
Wikimedia Foundation
User:Jmorgan (WMF) <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Jmorgan_(WMF)>