New subject: Research about discretionary sanctions on ENWP

18 Sep 2018

From: Sydney Poore &lt;spoore(a)wikimedia.org&gt;
To: Pine W &lt;wiki.pine(a)gmail.com&gt;
Cc: wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Bcc:
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 16:20:40 -0400
Subject: Re: Research about discretionary sanctions on ENWP
Hello Pine,
You might want to record it in the IdeaLab to make sure that it considered
for future reference when people are discussing ideas for research.
Sydney

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 4:01 PM Pine W &lt;wiki.pine(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:

...
  Hello colleagues,

 There is currently a small amount of discussion happening on an ENWP
 arbitration page

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment#Clarification_request:_Discretionary_sanctions>
 regarding what ENWP calls "discretionary sanctions

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Discretionary_sanctions>"
 practices. Does anyone know of research regarding the effects, good and
 bad, of the Arbcom authorization of discretionary sanctions? If not, then I
 suggest that this be a topic of future research, particularly for
 researchers involved with WMF's work on community health.

 Thank you,

 Pine
 ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine )

-- 
Sydney Poore
Trust and Safety Specialist
Wikimedia Foundation
Trust and Safety team;
Anti-harassment tools team

-- 
Sydney Poore
Trust and Safety Specialist
Wikimedia Foundation
Trust and Safety team;
Anti-harassment tools team

Fwd: Research about discretionary sanctions on ENWP