On Friday 06 November 2009, Michael Ekstrand wrote:
While not the primary result, we include charts of
the proportion of
revisions which are accepted. The metric should be applicable for a
more rigorous study of unproductive vs. productive work.
Since figure 15 seems to have a lower bound at 0.82, would it be safe to a further that at
least 82% of contributions are productive (i.e., accepted by the community/k-acceptance)?