Hi Dario,<br>Thank you. That&#39;s indeed a very interesting data set.<br><br>Is anyone aware of any study or analysis of this or similar data on &quot;article ratings&quot;?<br>Even a raw data analysis would be very helpful to set up a systematic study. Unfortunately, I&#39;m not update on the state of the art. <br>
<br>cheers,<br>.Taha<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Dario Taraborelli <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:dtaraborelli@wikimedia.org" target="_blank">dtaraborelli@wikimedia.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">We&#39;ve released a full, anonymized dump of article ratings (aka AFTv4) collected over 1 year since the deployment of the tool on the entire English Wikipedia (July 22, 2011 - July 22, 2012).<br>

<br>
<a href="http://thedatahub.org/en/dataset/wikipedia-article-ratings" target="_blank">http://thedatahub.org/en/dataset/wikipedia-article-ratings</a><br>
<br>
The dataset (which includes 11m unique article ratings along 4 dimensions) is licensed under CC0 and supersedes the partial dumps originally hosted on the dumps server. Real-time AFTv4 data remains available as usual via the toolserver. Feel free to get in touch if you have any questions about this data.<br>

<br>
Dario<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Wiki-research-l mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org">Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l" target="_blank">https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>.t<br><br>