I know this is an old branch of this topic, but since it generated quite some interest on this list, I thought I'd share this excellent article I recently found on double-blind vs. single-blind reviewing. It addresses most of the issues that were discussed in this sub-thread.
In brief, the editor of a prominent computer science journal recounts his exploration on which way to go with his journal. The journal decided to go double-blind because of its benefits (mainly protecting less powerful researchers), but his journal has a very detailed set of instructions (in the appendix) that do an excellent job addressing computer science projects that are difficult to anonymize, which I think are very much applicable to a wiki-based journal as discussed in this thread.
Snodgrass, Richard T. 2007. Editorial: Single- versus double-blind reviewing. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 32, 1. <http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1206049.1206050>
If you don't have access to the ACM Digital Library, you can get a PDF of the article from Google Scholar.
~ Chitu
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l