2012/1/26 Finn Aarup Nielsen <fn@imm.dtu.dk>
Hi Emijrp,
Hi Finn. Congrats for your survey draft, it is the most complete wiki survey by now. Are you working on it yet?
It is unclear for me how your wiki are distinguished from Acawiki, that one also being a Semantic MediaWiki with academic summaries.
Acawiki is a wiki for papers about any topic. WikiPapers is about wikis only, and also includes info about tools and datasets. Just like there is a Wikipedia and city wikis
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_wiki
AcaWiki seems to have 22 summaries:
http://acawiki.org/index.php?title=Special:BrowseData/Summary&Tag=Wikipedia
My Brede Wiki has 75 pages (most of which refers to academic papers):
http://neuro.imm.dtu.dk/wiki/Category:Wikipedia
Cool, I will look at those compilations. Thanks.
You are using the same license as I am on the Brede Wiki, so you could copy page from my wiki to yours (or vice versa). I have been talking to the AcaWiki people about exchanging summaries, but we haven't set up a service for that yet.
When you are using title as the identifier for the paper I have found it good to have a consistent rule for upper and lower case to have a as predictable title as possible. I use lower case as much as possible.
Yes. that is a solution, I'm planning to develop a bot to create redirects with minor changes in capitalization, too
Acawiki, yours and my wiki seem to use different fields in the MediaWiki template for describing a paper. My template uses fields that tries to align with Wikipedia's cite journal templates.
I will look at that. I want to add some new fields as "pages", "volume", "issue", etc.
Regards,
emijrp