On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 6:52 PM, James Salsman <jsalsman@gmail.com> wrote:

Do you think
     a comparison of
                    the effects of bias
                                   in individual candidates' articles
                  to
                    the effects [of] systemic bias
                                   towards trickle-down austerity economics
                  and the social implications thereof
                  in light of the WP:MEDRS-grade source
                     at http://talknicer.com/ehip.pdf
                        ["Income inequality and health: A causal review"
                         by Pickett & Wilkinson:
                                   "The body of evidence strongly
                                    suggests that income inequality
                                    affects population health and
                                    wellbeing"]
    might produce a helpful indication of
                  where counter-advocacy efforts would best be focused
?

I know you didn't ask, but in my opinion, that sentence works better as un poème concret.

One "formal" answer to your question would draw on the research you cited, and use the ideas there to specify editorial and other attentional and effort investment policies.

Viz., "Notable topics have attracted attention over a sufficiently significant period of time."

This is quite clearly a "trickle-up" policy: things become notable because of all of the aggregated attention.  We can imagine a sort of crisis point at which background noise transforms into a conscious perception.  I suspect that's probably a mistaken metaphor, and that consciousness is more like mycorrhizae, like or the Hawkin-Ahmad theory of neurons, in which "the majority of the patterns recognized by a neuron act as predictions by slightly depolarizing the neuron without immediately generating an action potential."  So, yes, there is a crisis point but it's not the only interesting thing.

Any massive inequality (income, attention, political perspective) points to a potential crisis.  If one wanted to put forth a general policy, it might be to look for what happens before the crisis.  For example we could study Psy's 17th single, "Korea" (the 18th being "Gagnam style"), and notice how it anticipates a "breakthrough" both lyrically and in the cinematography of its music video.  Or for an example closer to home, look at how your sentence above was coiled like a snake ready to strike.

Still, I think (especially given the examples you've mentioned) it is also important to avoid false comparisons.  E.g. what relative weight should be given to Hillary Clinton's email server vs Donald Trump's treatment of women, or what have you.  On this point I think Bergson's theory of "false problems" repays study. http://hadideeb.com/journal/2016/7/24/bergson-false-problems.html