Even more, you can easily identify the authors because usually they include references to their previous publications to build the new hypothesis ...
Most of my reviewing for conference and journals was double blind, although the effectiveness of it was always a bit questionable, as in many cases you can, as a reviewer, identify the author from the style and argument. This tends to get worse in specialised areas, where the pool of researchers is necessarily small.
AdamOn 7 November 2012 06:16, Kerry Raymond <kerry.raymond@gmail.com> wrote:
I cannot speak for other disciplines but double-blind is not standard in Computer Science.
Kerry
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l