Interesting Piotr, I&#39;m working in a similar approach <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Emijrp/All_human_knowledge">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Emijrp/All_human_knowledge</a><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">

2011/9/12 Piotr Konieczny <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:pik1@pitt.edu">pik1@pitt.edu</a>&gt;</span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
  
    
  
  <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"><div class="im">
    On 9/10/2011 5:04 PM, emijrp wrote:
    <blockquote type="cite">The interesting thing here is, 4.8M unique red links
      in 2009, and unique 5.6M red links in 2011. <i>The more articles
        are created, the more articles are missing</i>. <br>
      <br>
    </blockquote></div>
    Doesn&#39;t surprise me; my rough calculations
    (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Piotrus/Wikipedia_interwiki_and_specialized_knowledge_test" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Piotrus/Wikipedia_interwiki_and_specialized_knowledge_test</a>)
    suggest Wikipedia is not even a tenth-complete at this point (just
    talking about existing articles, and not their quality).<br><font color="#888888">
    <pre cols="72">-- 
Piotr Konieczny
PhD Candidate
Dept of Sociology
Uni of Pittsburgh

<a href="http://pittsburgh.academia.edu/PiotrKonieczny/" target="_blank">http://pittsburgh.academia.edu/PiotrKonieczny/</a>
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Piotrus" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Piotrus</a></pre>
  </font></div>

<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Wiki-research-l mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org">Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l" target="_blank">https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>