Just a graph in case this is helpful:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Very_active_editors,_January-July,_…
More graphs might help to further inform the conversation, such as graphs
about VE edits.
By the way, is there an easy way to get info on from
https://stats.wikimedia.org about editor activity levels that excludes bots?
It might also be nice to have tables on
https://stats.wikimedia.org with VE
editing statistics.
Pine
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 12:52 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo) <nemowiki(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Kerry Raymond, 25/08/2015 02:57:
It would be interesting to have some coarse
characterisation of edits to
see if any growth in edit count is spread uniformly against all
contribution types or if the growth is disproportionate some way
https://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/TablesWikipediaZZ.htm#editor_activity_levels
is often a good proxy, because certain contributor types are dominated by
certain kinds of contribution.
For instance 1+ editors are usually inexperienced and 2500+ editors are
usually doing maintenance.
Nemo
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l