Taha,

other than the internal reports during the product dev phase [1] and some occasional uses of this data in the literature, there hasn't been much work on AFT ratings. To my knowledge, the best use of this data outside of WMF is in Adam Hyland's work (he presented a study at Wikimania [2] and I think he's working on a follow-up paper).

Dario

[1] http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Article_feedback/Research

[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Protonk/Article_Feedback

On Oct 27, 2012, at 6:57 AM, Taha Yasseri <taha.yaseri@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Dario,
Thank you. That's indeed a very interesting data set.

Is anyone aware of any study or analysis of this or similar data on "article ratings"?
Even a raw data analysis would be very helpful to set up a systematic study. Unfortunately, I'm not update on the state of the art.

cheers,
.Taha

On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Dario Taraborelli <dtaraborelli@wikimedia.org> wrote:

We've released a full, anonymized dump of article ratings (aka AFTv4) collected over 1 year since the deployment of the tool on the entire English Wikipedia (July 22, 2011 - July 22, 2012).

http://thedatahub.org/en/dataset/wikipedia-article-ratings

The dataset (which includes 11m unique article ratings along 4 dimensions) is licensed under CC0 and supersedes the partial dumps originally hosted on the dumps server. Real-time AFTv4 data remains available as usual via the toolserver. Feel free to get in touch if you have any questions about this data.

Dario
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

--
.t

_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l