Alain Désilets wrote:
I need a good solid reference to substantiate the
following claim:
"Besides leading to high quality content, wikis have been shown to be good tools
for fostering the emergence of active communities"
Does anyone know of a good research paper that looks specifically at this kind of
impact of wikis?
Brian replied:
I think the first part of your claim needs to be
substantiated first! Almost all of the
content on the English Wikipedia, for example, is of low quality.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Index
I already have a solid reference to substantiate the fact that Wikipedia has quality
content, i.e. the Nature Magazne study of 2005:
http://www.nature.com/news/2005/051212/full/438900a.html
This study found that the quality of Wikipedia content was comparable to that of
Britannica (on a sample of 42 pages in various scientific domains).
The page you quote above does not constitute a scientific assessment of the quality of
WikiPedia pages. For one thing, it's not a random sample. These are pages that people
on the editorial board selected for review, and it could be that they naturally focused on
pages that were a-priori more likely to present quality issues. Second, it does not
compare the quality of wikipedia pages to the quality of corresponding pages on more
traditional resources.
The Nature study on the other hand was scientifically sound on both of those points. It
did a random sample of pages on a broad range of scientific topics. And it compared the
quality of those pages to comparable pages on Brittanica.
The Nature study is also consistent with my personal experience (and that of most people I
talk to) as a user of Wikipedia. In other words, whenever I go to a Wikipedia page on a
topic that I know well, I find it to be good quality and accurate.
So... Until someone shows me a scientifically sound demonstration that Wikipedia pages are
of significantly lower quality than other more traditional resources, I will continue
claiming that wikis like Wikipedia can lead to quality content.
----
Alain Désilets, National Research Council of Canada
Chair, WikiSym 2007
2007 International Symposium on Wikis
Wikis at Work in the World:
Open, Organic, Participatory Media for the 21st Century
http://www.wikisym.org/ws2007/