I guess I'm having difficulty with language. To me, "lifespan" implies a birth and death. The overwhelming number of Wikipedia articles that survive the review process continue on. So how do you measure a lifespan of articles that are still living? Perhaps you can explain a little bit more.

Bob Kosovsky, Ph.D. -- Curator, Rare Books and Manuscripts,
Music Division, The New York Public Library for the Performing Arts
blog: http://www.nypl.org/blog/author/44 Twitter: @kos2
Listowner: OPERA-L ; SMT-ANNOUNCE ; SoundForge-users
- My opinions do not necessarily represent those of my institutions -

Inspiring Lifelong Learning | Advancing Knowledge | Strengthening Our Communities

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Stella Yu <stella@stellaresults.com> wrote:
Thank you for sharing this link. I will take a look. Below is a description of my intent.

Thesis: Wikipedia content can last more than 1 year.
Audience: Public relations and brand managers
The intent is to prepare an infographic that presents the longevity of Wikipedia articles. Type of article is not of significance. Or should it?

Sincere regards,

Stella
--
Stella Yu | STELLARESULTS | 415 690 7827
"Chronicling heritage brands and legendary people."

On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 11:15 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) <nemowiki@gmail.com> wrote:
Stella Yu, 29/11/2016 07:00:

Where could I find data on the lifespan of different types of Wikipedia
articles?

What do you mean by "lifespan"? Does http://wikipapers.referata.com/wiki/Revision_history help?

Nemo

_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l