Hoi,
Having read it, I find it is still very much a Wikipedia oriented.It makes
use of the toolset by Markus. That is fine. the notion of diversity and
notability is also very much culturally defined. It would be nice to know
how the different wikipedias accept notability of people from other
cultures and if it impacts the diversity of their own articles.
I have found that many people do not have an article in the languages of
their own cultures. Often it has to do with an interest in a domain that is
more of relevance to the other culture.
Diversity is very much part of a domain; in Roman Catholicism male
dominance is obvious. I am curious if diversity in gender is affected by
such considerations and if items with a single article are more in line
with what is the norm for a culture, a domain.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 10 January 2015 at 11:51, Piotr Konieczny <piokon(a)post.pl> wrote:
Here
(
http://notconfusing.com/preliminary-results-from-wigi-
the-wikipedia-gender-inequality-index/) are some early findings from a
research project I am involved in (together with Maximilian Klein). (To
find out more about the project, see
https://meta.wikimedia.org/
wiki/Research:Wikipedia_Gender_Inequality_Index and it's talk page). We
are very curious what you think (don't hesitate to be critical). What we
would really appreciate would be any alternative hypotheses (to the one
presented) that could try to explain why post-1950s Confucian and South
Asian clusters seem so much more inclusive of female biographies than
others (including the "Western" clusters). Are we seeing a data error, or
something else - and if so, what?
--
Piotr Konieczny, PhD
http://hanyang.academia.edu/PiotrKonieczny
http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=gdV8_AEAAAAJ
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Piotrus
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l