I think we need to open a page on meta: and compile all the ideas launched in this tread, that are a lot and good ones.
hi,
I think one good thing about the standard review process is that
> Once the publication process is launched then yes, normally everything
> (initial sub, reviews, responses, final paper) is published.
authors are motivated to strive for excellence, since they do not know
if their revised submission is finally going to be accepted. From this
point of view, it is good not to give a promise of publication on the
early stage.
>From the point of view of ISI politics, it is also important to have a
comparable statistics of rejection rates.
In any case, I think that supporting JPP would be a great solution,
especially if JPP was willing to consider some adjustments in
publication policy (or at least open it for a discussion). It is much
easier to partner with an existing journal than start form the scratch
(and also, JPP seems to be very well targeted to our model solution
here, and seems also to reach a little outside just the wiki world,
which is a good thing, too).
OK, it has been way too much from me, and I apologize for inundating the list.
best,
dj
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l