Thanks Nemo.

Here's a new version of the highly active editors graph, plus some additional graphs for consideration:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Very_active_editors,_January-July,_2013,_2014_and_2015.jpg (note that the Commons preview may still show the old version, so download the full size image to see the updated version)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Very_active_editors,_January-July,_2013,_2014_and_2015,_vertical_base_set_to_zero.jpg


https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Active_editors,_January-July,_2013,_2014_and_2015.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Active_editors,_January-July,_2013,_2014_and_2015,_vertical_base_set_to_zero.jpg

Pine


On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 2:09 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo) <nemowiki@gmail.com> wrote:
Pine W, 29/08/2015 01:00:
By the way, is there an easy way to get info on from
https://stats.wikimedia.org about editor activity levels that excludes bots?

They all exclude bots unless otherwise specified, see docs.


Nemo

_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l