You're right, Stuart. Having a byline (and not worrying so much about what is said) is probably enough because it would be clear who is speaking.

I have reviewed in the past and want to start again now that I have a bit more time. Dario, Tilman, you usually let us know when things need to be reviewed on this list, right? Perhaps we can do something similar when the newsletter is ready for a last proof as Joe suggests. And since I've been so opinionated, I will chat to others to try to help out streamline it a bit more because I know that everyone is really pressed for time when it comes to the newsletter. It's so great and important that I'm sure we can all help out a bit more :)

Heather Ford
Oxford Internet Institute Doctoral Programme
EthnographyMatters | Oxford Digital Ethnography Group
http://hblog.org | @hfordsa

On 3 July 2014 17:58, Joe Corneli <holtzermann17@gmail.com> wrote:

On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Taha Yasseri <taha.yaseri@gmail.com> wrote:
> Your contributions are always very welcome.. (well, please do it
> before the release of the issue, but in few cases we have changed even after
> the release, Tilman knows the best about this).

I've just subscribed to the newsletter as a mailing list - via
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/research-newsletter

... But perhaps it would be useful to have a pre-release version of
the mailing list, that would send it out a day or two in advance of
the "official" release to persons who might be interested to help edit
(or at least proofread)?

(I realize this might sound like crazy talk, but it's meant as a
serious suggestion.)

_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l