Liam Wyatt wrote:
More to the point:
What is the point to your agressive reply? If you're not interested in
this thread then you are not obliged to be snarky about it.
I don't think Gerard is trying to be aggressive. The point is, everyone
has a different understanding of "regular". It is inherently
subjective, and there is no point in trying to agree on a definition.
It makes more sense just to say explicitly, e.g.
"This study will focus on contributors who made more than 50 edits in
the last year" [or whatever].
on a case by case basis.