I wanted to say that one of the things I enjoyed very much about the 2005 reunion was the time I got to spend in everyone else's company, based on the fact that our work was pretty much evenly distributed among the group. I don't doubt for a minute that we could do a play, or even two. But I prefer the burdens of performance to be more equally shared, and I'll note that that the idea of performing selected scenes and passages from Shakespeare has its own time-honored tradition.
--m
But I want to have fun not just work myself into the ground. Two
plays in a week would kill me. But then I have always loved the more
leisurely approach to creativity
Terry
Sent from my iPhone
On May 20, 2010, at 10:48 AM, "Bruce Meyer" <Bruce.Meyer@UTSouthwestern.edu
> wrote:
> Actually, i AM serious about the two play suggestion - massive
> undertaking, so just the kind of impossible task that we are best
> suited for....
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Kozusko <kozusko@mac.com>
> To: <weeklong-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
>
> Sent: 5/20/2010 8:20:53 AM
> Subject: Re: [Weeklong-l] thoughts from a brain that is spending too
> muchtime in the real world....
>
>
> Dear All,
>
> A grinning and excited second for Bruce's suggestion that we consider
> longer chunks of fewer plays so that we can get some of the playlong
> arcs into our storytelling. And two full plays is a great idea, I
> think, if you're serious.
>
> Matt
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Weeklong-l mailing list
> Weeklong-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/weeklong-l
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Weeklong-l mailing list
> Weeklong-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/weeklong-l
_______________________________________________
Weeklong-l mailing list
Weeklong-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/weeklong-l