Okay... I'm willing to go second. I thank Stu for starting this topic.
I'll try to write this from my mind stream. I'm writing this both as WMIL chairman and as its treasurer. Some of the things I'll write are my personal views (some are reflected as board resolutions and some aren't). I'll try to use italic font whenever I'm expressing an opinion rather than actual facts.
OverviewWikimedia Israel is an Israeli charitable non-government organisation. It was established and registered on 2007. Our primary governing document are the
bylaws.
GovernanceThe bylaws gives us a general framework for our activities. The actual decision making is done in the board. The board is a group of 5 people elect by the general assembly. We used to have board meetings every month but lately due to some personality changes we shifted the center of decision making to emails and chats via gmail chat.
The audit committee is a two members committee responsible for checking that the chapter's expenditures is done according to its objectives (as defined by the bylaws) and that the decision was made using a proper decision making process. The audit committee is part of the board's mailing list and is invited (and usually come) to the board meetings.
The general assembly is the group of all chapter members. The bylaws states that the general assembly should meet once a year to approve all financial reports.
There are several ways to be part of the chapter. A member must be a
person above 18, with previous history of contribution to free content
projects. Until lately, being a member was subject to an annual fee.
We've tried several fares until recently we've decided that the whole
annual membership fee is more of a hassle than a joy and decided to
replace them with entrance fee (or, in legal terms: membership fee for
99 years). A person which is not above 18 or has no previous history
contributions to free content can join the chapter as a fellow. Someone
who wished to contribute the chapter without paying the membership fee
is an activist (or a contributor). Both fellows and activists enjoy the
same rights as members apart from the right to vote in general
assemblies or offer themselves for official roles. Whenever someone wants to join the chapter we express that we prefer activists over members and that there's no need to pay in order to be part of the good stuff we do.
Opinions and Future Plans about GovernanceSince its founding it felt like the chapter belongs to its board. We're now at the process of changing that. Instead of holding the assemblies at someone's house we're renting a meeting space per hour. We urge the members to participate the assembly and ask them to give a brief overview of projects they're running.
The bylaws does not define a specific time period for which the board is elected. This had led previous members of the board to the belief that they were appointed (much like the Pope or the Queen of England) for life. We're now looking for the proper way to change the bylaws so that the board will be elected for a period of one year and the general assembly will have to re-elect every member after this period (I'd also like to set a maximum term period but this doesn't seem to be in consensus). In any case, the board have been completely replaced during the last two years. This seemed to bring new blood to the chapter (However, I'm biased on this: I'm one of those who were elected instead of the "old board" members).
Finance\Legal:Our main finance method was the annual fundraising. We are trying (and usually succeed) running a low budget-high impact projects. Whenever we do need a budget, we either find a sponsor (like we did with Wikimania or our Africa project) or we ask for a grant from the foundation (like we did with the 10th anniversary event). We have some reserve money and we have good ties with other organisations with more money.
We usually don't have legal problems. When someone bugs us with a cease and desist letter we send him to pursue the WMF. That usually does the work.
Our most valuable asset is our relationship with the community. This allows us to initiate projects with other organisations. Since we cannot bring money to these collaborations we bring our collective wisdom and workforce. We have good reputation and other organisations see the added value we can bring to projects. We also have an excellent spokesman which can create PR interest in the projects
We do not employ. We sometimes (
and I wish we would do that more) hire a contractor for a specific task.
Transperancy We publish all board and GA minutes in our website. Despite the fact that the law oblige us only toward the GA we see the entire Hebrew Wikipedia community as stackholders. We invite them through the village pump to meetings and ask for their input about the minutes we publish.
Government regulationThe chapter is subject to two regulators. Our financial and annual reports are subject to auditing from the IRS. We submit those reports annually like any other legal entity in Israel (let that be a charitable-NGO, company or a self-employed). In addition to the IRS we're subject to the "NGO-registrar" (
this seems like a good translation) which checks our activities to verify and gives "proper process certification" (Another inaccurate but sufficient translation).
Both the IRS and the registrar does not waste much time about NGO's in our scale. They usually automatically approve our reports and issue whatever we need.
Planning
To date, we didn't excel in planning. 2012 was the first year in which we were able to come up with a work plan on Decmeber (we also approved retroactively the work plan for 2011 on that date :) ). Israel has a long improvising tradition. So the work plan is somewhat subject to changes during the year.
At the general assembly the board display the work plan. If during the assembly there are objections to the plan we put it to vote. Otherwise, it is automatically approved.
That's about it. I'm available to any question.
Tomer Ashur
Chairman & Treasurer
Wikimedia Israel