first Kudos to Christophe for his detailed reports and devout
On 3/12/07, Florence Devouard <Anthere9(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
Plenty of good stuff here. And in reading this specific part, I was
wondering if you should not discuss this with Sandy as well so that it
be part of the other reform she is working on for communication issues.
Yes, it will be nice for us all to have Sandy as participant to this
discussion. I expect she subscribes it, and let her idea in the next
week (she is now am 3 or 4 on Monday, I suppose).
I do not know if it is a good idea to do a transwiki.
It has positive
and negative sides. On the positive, it will be probably much easier for
you to organise. On the other hand, less visibility to recruit new
Yes, there are both bright side and dark side. Through the discussion
on translations-l, however we found several points we want to improve.
They will be reflected to the ongoing reconstruction of
Since there are already a lengthy thread on translations-l, I expect
all of you follow the thread on translation-l for readers'
* habent enim emolumentum in labore suo *