Hi. I was unclear.
... it was reverted [ because it did not work ] ... and deployed again
[ thus we have the problem back since ]
This is not the intended message, is it?
On 29.01.2016 18:38, Johan Jönsson wrote:
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Purodha Blissenbach
Hi. The text:
It was reverted on January 23 and deployed against last week.
is imho too abiguous.
This has now been rephrased.
("Last week" will always be a bit confusing when we read it on
because it's actually this week, but the newsletter isn't delivered