On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Merlijn van Deen <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:valhallasw@arctus.nl">valhallasw@arctus.nl</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="gmail_quote"><div class="gmail_quote"><div>On 12 March 2012 15:49, Hydriz Wikipedia <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:admin@alphacorp.tk" target="_blank">admin@alphacorp.tk</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>

<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Tparis has the full source code of those tools, and looks like he has<br>
already brought them up on his own account. See<br>
<a href="https://toolserver.org/~tparis" target="_blank">https://toolserver.org/~tparis</a>.<br><br></blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>Could we (in general) *please* not do this? If someones tools are important enough to be taken over by someone else, they are most certainly important enough for a multi-maintainer project. In {one month, one year, five years}, Tparis&#39; account will also expire and we will have the same problem all over again.</div>



<div><br></div><div>Best,</div><div>Merlijn</div></div>
</div></blockquote></div><br><div>I agree. There&#39;s also the issue of updating links all over the place. Where an MMP would have permanent links, regardless of who maintains it.</div>