On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Petr Onderka <gsvick(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Ryan Lane
If there's a crucial bot or tool that uses a
proprietary license and the
benefactor decides to revoke its license, what do we do?
I don't think licenses usually work that way.
If I share some code under an open source license, I can't later
decide to revoke it.
Similarly, if I share some application or library under a freeware
license (gratis, but not open source), I think I can't later decide to
just revoke it (unless the original license terms clearly stated that
I can do that, or unless it was a time-limited license to begin with).
Almost all software licenses fall into that "unless".
The conditions under which they are revocable vary from license, and the
variations are more or less problematic when you're trying to build a
long-term, stable, sustainable project. But they're definitely almost all
revocable. If they aren't revocable, they probably weren't written in
consultation with a lawyer, and so they probably have other problems -
failure to grant all the rights you actually need to run or modify the
software being common examples.
Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org)
Posting guidelines for this list:
Deputy General Counsel
415.839.6885 ext. 6810
NOTICE: *This message may be confidential or legally privileged. If you
have received it by accident, please delete it and let us know about the
mistake. As an attorney for the Wikimedia Foundation, for legal/ethical
reasons I cannot give legal advice to, or serve as a lawyer for, community
members, volunteers, or staff members in their personal capacity.*