On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Ryan Lane <rlane@wikimedia.org> wrote:
The long-term plan is to have OSM in production. OSM in Labs is meant
for puppetization, test, and development. I think we even have the
hardware for OSM in production. Someone just needs to put the effort
in for puppetization.
- Ryan
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Kolossos
<tim.alder@s2002.tu-chemnitz.de> wrote:
> Am 27.09.2012 17:21, schrieb Andrei Cipu:
>
>> Where can we find more information about these projects, especially OSM
>> and WLM?
>
>
> For OSM you can look at:
> https://labsconsole.wikimedia.org/wiki/Nova_Resource:Maps
>
> None of that instances has a public IP or an planet import in the moment. So
> it's far away from being usable, but that's also what Ryan said.
>
> We don't know how efficient a PostgreSQL server runs in a virtualisation,
> but after talk with some PostgreSQL experts I'm a little bit sceptical.
> We also don't know if the foundation will maintain an external
> high-performance db-server for OSM rendering or if we are as a non-wikimedia
> project at the end of the priority list or out-of-scope.
>
> Especially we don't know when will labs be ready for production. We could
> need it at begining of next year or sooner to roll-out a CPB-project
> (sponsored by German chapter) and to do other map things.
>
> Greetings Tim alias Kolossos
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org)
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l
> Posting guidelines for this list:
> https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
_______________________________________________
Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org)
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l
Posting guidelines for this list: https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette